Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Proposal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Housing committee defers unsolicited transit‑parcel development after concerns over 120% AMI and High Line impact
Summary
The committee deferred Item 3A to Oct. 14 after members raised concerns that the unsolicited proposal offers units at 120% AMI (pricing many local residents out), lacks a community‑benefits package and does not include a contribution to Hialeah’s High Line; commissioners also asked administration to consult the new Hialeah mayor.
The Miami‑Dade County Housing Committee voted to defer consideration of Item 3A — an unsolicited proposal to develop a county transit parcel — to the committee’s Oct. 14 meeting after commissioners pressed the administration for answers about affordability, community benefits and coordination with the City of Hialeah.
Commissioner Regaldo opened the discussion, asking the administration to explain communications with Hialeah and how the proposed deal would affect the city’s High Line project. Director Stacy Miller said the draft ground lease and development agreement contain provisions intended to protect the High Line but added, “my team has informed me that there is no contribution to the High Line in the current development agreement.”
Commissioners focused much of their criticism on the proposal’s affordability metrics. Chairwoman Bastian read the plan’s AMI table and noted that at “120% AMI for a family of 1, you have to be making $114,480 a year to qualify,” and for a family of four the threshold was $163,440. Commissioner Regalado said the application is labeled “Hialeah Senior Living” in one place, then described as affordable and workforce housing elsewhere and “smells like a flip.” Vice Chairwoman Lopez called the AMI standard misleading and said, “I think we should declare war on this AMI idea,” arguing the county’s AMI bands fail to reflect the incomes of most workers in many districts.
Administration and housing staff also discussed whether the project must be procured competitively. Deputy Director Clarence Brown said recent HUD guidance can require competitive solicitation when HUD funding is involved but that this parcel is not a RAD or HUD‑funded transaction; he added the developer may nonetheless seek other affordable‑housing financing. Brown said the department will participate in negotiations and examine surtax eligibility for the proposed deal.
Given unresolved questions about Hialeah outreach, community benefits for transit (the parcel is a transit asset) and the apparent mismatch between advertised affordability and AMI thresholds, the committee approved a motion to defer the item to Oct. 14 so staff, the county housing department and transit officials can confer and return with more details.
The committee recorded no formal roll‑call tally in the transcript; Chairwoman Bastian announced the deferral and commissioners signaled assent.
