Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pickleball supporters urge council to build six–eight courts at Rotary Park

Galesburg City Council · August 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Several residents, players and a King Elementary PE teacher told the Galesburg City Council they back building six to eight outdoor pickleball courts at Rotary Park and resurfacing Bateman Court to provide low-cost recreation for youth and the community.

Supporters of new pickleball facilities delivered nearly unanimous public-comment backing to the Galesburg City Council on Aug. 4, arguing the courts would provide low-cost recreation, intergenerational activity and the ability to host tournaments.

“Sue Hewlett, a member of the pickleball focus group, said the group supports building six to eight outdoor courts at Rotary Park to handle overflow play and to enable Galesburg to host tournaments and bring visitors and revenue,” the chair said while recognizing public comment. Hewlett told the council the focus group has advised city staff and expressed disappointment about the pace of progress but remains optimistic the project could move forward in coming seasons.

Teresa Rasch, representing Ward 1, Precinct 4, urged resurfacing Bateman Court in addition to the Rotary Park expansion, saying a new court and resurfaced facilities would offer affordable options for youth and families and support mental and physical health. Ginny Atwell, a PE teacher at King Elementary, said she has found community and new friendships through pickleball and encouraged the council to continue with the planned courts.

Council members did not take immediate action during public comment but thanked speakers and said staff and council are examining the project in multiple ways. The chair noted the city continues to evaluate the proposal and encouraged residents to contact city administration for follow-up; no final timeline was specified during the meeting.