Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sylvania committee sends downtown zoning draft back to administration for clause-by-clause comparison
Summary
After a 49-minute annexation and zoning committee meeting, council members asked administration to prepare a section-by-section comparison of the existing B-3 downtown code and the SmithGroup/Michelle Johnson draft before re-engaging the consultant; members split over code specificity vs. administrative flexibility.
Get email alerts on the Downtown Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Doug Hainan, chair of the annexation and zoning committee, opened the discussion on proposed revisions to Sylvania’s downtown central business (B-3) zoning code and asked council to decide how much change to pursue.
Leslie Stowell and other committee members reviewed the history of the downtown master plan work with consultant Michelle Johnson and the SmithGroup. Stowell said the consultant has provided several drafts and that "Michelle does still ... have 1 meeting with her under our contract," and recommended returning council comments to the consultant after the committee frames its priorities.
The committee debated whether detailed design guidance — including suggested color palettes and performance guarantees in parts of the draft — should be written into the zoning code or handled administratively by the Board of Architectural Review. One committee member warned that overly specific code could constrain redevelopment of the downtown "canvas," while others said clearer baseline standards would give developers more certainty.
Doug Hainan summarized the committee’s assessment in the committee report to council: "the current way the current zoning code is written seems to be meeting our current needs pretty well." That view, he said, framed the committee’s decision to ask administration to prepare a section-by-section comparison of the SmithGroup recommendations and the existing code before any further drafting.
Council members also discussed whether to prohibit new single-family homes in B-3, how to balance design standards and density across a roughly 10–15 acre downtown footprint, and whether planned developments (PDs) should remain the primary tool for exceptions. The committee agreed that administration will draft a clear starting-point comparison for council review, and the matter will return to the committee for a deeper, work-session style review before re-engaging the consultant.
