Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Esg Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves ESG recommendations after staff notes slow start for one project
Summary
Committee approved Emergency Solutions Grant recommendations to forward to City Council; staff told members one program had a delayed start because its HUD agreement arrived late and agency policy prevented work until the agreement was fully executed.
The Citizen Advisory Committee voted to approve staff recommendations for the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) applicants and to forward those recommendations to City Council.
Janie Christenson noted one program, referred to as the "Just 1 project," had a slow start because the relevant agreement with HUD was not executed until October, delaying agency activities. "Their agency's policy is they're not going to work the program until they have an agreement in hand," Christenson said, explaining the slow rollout. Committee members discussed whether to reallocate or otherwise adjust awards for the second year, but staff said second-year allocations remain the committee's decision.
A motion to accept the ESG recommendations was made and seconded; the motion passed with members indicating aye and remote members recorded as present. During the discussion staff read a figure aloud for the ESG total as part of the packet, but the number was not clearly enunciated on the audio (the transcript records the utterance as "It's $55.09 86"). Staff said they will confirm federal totals and update grantees once HUD final numbers are available.
Why it matters: ESG funds support emergency shelter and homelessness prevention services. Delays in agreement execution can slow service delivery, and the committee is tracking whether programs catch up now that agreements are in place.
What happens next: Staff will finalize paperwork, reach out to grantees for budget updates, and forward recommendations to City Council.
