Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grace Estates Wetlands Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors press planners on wetlands, drainage and 12-foot setback risk in Grace Estates discussion
Summary
Residents objected to proposed lot placement and wetland setbacks during the Planning Commission’s March 18 hearing on the 12-lot Grace Estates subdivision, raising concerns about standing water, potential house placement 12 feet from a rear lot line, and the adequacy of drainage plans. City staff said the city follows Army Corps permits and that final house placement is reviewed at building permit stage.
At a packed March 18 hearing, residents near the proposed Grace Estates subdivision urged the Avon Planning Commission to reconsider how wetland setbacks and stormwater will affect adjacent properties.
Lauri Mathie, whose family owns four parcels on Jaycox Road, said she feared a house could be built as little as 12 feet from her rear property line and that the city was not following EPA-recommended 75-foot wetland setbacks. She told commissioners she recorded videos to show standing water and that stakes near neighbors suggested a driveway could be “about 10 to 15 feet” from an existing yard. “I did not receive any follow-up communication,” Mathie said of prior staff outreach after an inspector visited her property, a lapse she said increased residents' frustration.
City Engineer Ryan Cummins responded with technical clarifications, saying the 50-foot figure shown on the project’s Stormwater Prevention Plan concerns temporary stabilization timing during construction, not a permanent city setback. “The 50-foot [note] is part of the SWPPP and addresses temporary stabilization and timing of re-seeding and mulching,” Cummins said, adding that the City follows Army Corps of Engineers permit conditions rather than EPA guidance.
Residents also pressed the developer on drainage details. Ed Prybylski and Dale Mathie described a minimal swale and historic standing water behind their lots; Cummins said the subdivision will include a detention basin adjacent to Detroit Road and a 24-inch storm sewer running north along Elizabeth Street designed to reduce peak outflow and improve drainage compared with current conditions.
Developer representative Noam Adler acknowledged the concerns and said the engineering team had worked with the city to design detention and conveyance systems intended to reduce runoff. Adler also said future buyers could purchase wetland mitigation credits to shift house placement if they wished, but he did not commit to a fixed buffer. The commission and staff emphasized that exact home siting is determined at the time individual building plans are submitted and that those plans are reviewed by the Building Department.
The exchange underscored a recurring tension between neighbors who want larger buffers and the constraints of federal and state permitting. Several residents asked the city to improve notification and to ensure the developer considers buffering and house placement to reduce direct impacts to long-time homeowners.
Planning staff and the law director reiterated the limits of the city’s authority: if a proposed home meets the existing code setbacks, the city must approve the permit. Mr. Gasior said denial solely because a neighbor dislikes the location would not be lawful. The meeting closed with staff promising to share the Army Corps permit and to notify residents of the City Council schedule for the developer’s agreement.
