Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Green Waste Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parks committee recommends keeping city-run green yard-waste service, favors smaller rear-loader truck
Summary
After reviewing six weeks of route-level data, the Parks & Forestry Committee recommended retaining the two-person rear-load green yard-waste operation and buying a smaller 11‑yard truck (under $200,000), citing redundancy and lower lifecycle risk compared with privatization or an expensive front-loader option.
The Parks & Forestry Committee on May 4 reviewed options for Sylvania’s green yard‑waste program and recommended keeping the city‑run, two‑person rear‑load service while buying a smaller replacement truck.
Service director Joe Shaw presented route- and GIS-based data collected June 8–July 19 and said the program averaged about 1,050–1,100 stops every two weeks during the sample period. He told the committee that Parks and Forestry spent about 1,800 hours collecting material in 2024 and that fewer than 20% of the city’s refuse and recycling customers used the green yard program. "Less than 20% of Sylvania residents are using our greener waste program," Shaw said.
Shaw reviewed three options: privatization (vendor proposals for April–October weekly service), a one‑man front‑loader/toter model (vendor quote about $515,000 plus $75,000 in toters), and the current two‑person rear‑loader model with a smaller new truck (an 11‑yard unit quoted under $200,000). He flagged operational risk with the toter/front‑loader option — vendors lacked short‑term rental or replacement trucks, leaving no redundancy if specialized equipment failed — and noted $62,500 in maintenance on the existing truck across 15 years.
Shaw also outlined program finances: annual revenue from bags and stickers is about $70,000 and labor costs were modeled using AFSCME rates; his multi‑year modeling showed only a modest cumulative cost advantage to keeping the city operation. Based on the risk of vendor proposals charging every household and the lack of rental redundancy for toter trucks, the service director recommended option 3, keeping the city‑provided two‑person operation and buying the smaller truck. The committee endorsed that recommendation and asked administration to return with authorization language for the purchase.
