Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sheriff Accountability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Attorney Tom Perez defends Sheriff Christina Corpus as public comment fills chambers

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Tom Perez, representing Sheriff Christina Corpus, used roughly 12 minutes of public comment to deny allegations in the Cordell report and request a civil grand‑jury proceeding. Dozens of residents then addressed the board in a lengthy public‑comment period, many defending the sheriff and pressing for greater public involvement and due process.

Tom Perez, an attorney at Mayer Brown speaking on behalf of Mayor and Sheriff Corpus, addressed the board in a lengthy public comment and asked that the civil grand jury be allowed to proceed first so the community could be heard. Perez disputed assertions in the Cordell report, calling some allegations "patently false" and said he would pursue defamation remedies, adding, “We are here to defend her vigorously, and we will bring the truth forward.”

A sustained public-comment block that followed included many speakers who said they voted for Sheriff Christina Corpus and for Measure A, urged the board to respect voters’ will, or described personal experiences under the sheriff’s reforms. Other public speakers urged oversight and cited the county charter changes authorizing the board to remove a sheriff for cause. Several commenters and community groups asked the board to use established processes (civil grand jury or recall) and to involve the public in any selection of a successor if the sheriff were removed.

The board did not act on removal during the meeting; instead, the record includes dozens of public comments and two distinct appeals: legal defense and calls for independent oversight and public involvement. The exchange highlighted sharp divisions in public views and set up further hearings and legal processes to come.