Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Variance Legal Status topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members disagree over whether 1999 variance ‘runs with the property’
Summary
Board members and staff disputed whether a handwritten 1999 file note means a prior variance is transferable to new owners; staff cited that the variance had been limited to the earlier owner and could require a new appeal or authenticated documentation to change its status.
Board members spent significant time examining archival notes and past practice to decide whether an earlier variance attached to the land or to an individual owner. Staff noted the prior variance appeared granted to a specific owner and said that when that owner left or sold the building the variance was no longer automatically enforceable.
"The variance was only for her," a staff member said while recounting the original file language and the circumstances under which the inspector recorded the citation. Board members countered that departmental practice or later internal notes suggested the variance might have been treated as running with the property; several members asked staff to locate supporting paperwork or an authoritative departmental memorandum.
