Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Mateo County board authorizes lawsuit challenging HHS interpretation of 'public benefit'
Summary
San Mateo County supervisors voted 4-0 in closed session to authorize litigation challenging a recent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services interpretation of 'federal public benefit' under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.
Get email alerts on the Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Mateo County supervisors authorized the county to initiate litigation to challenge a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) interpretation of 'federal public benefit' under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. County counsel told the board the action was approved in closed session on a 4-0 vote, with one supervisor absent.
"In closed session, the board voted, on a 4 0 basis with supervisor Corso absent to authorize the county to initiate litigation to challenge the US Department Health and Human Services, interpretation recently... of federal public benefit for purposes of... the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996," county counsel reported when the board reconvened. The report did not provide additional detail about the legal theories or the expected timing for filing. The board did not take public testimony on the legal authorization because it was handled in closed session.
County counsel indicated the vote to authorize litigation was unanimous among those present but provided no further public briefing on whether the lawsuit would seek a preliminary injunction, the exact legal claims, or potential fiscal exposure. The board's action continues a pattern of local governments contesting federal administrative interpretations that they argue could affect eligibility for public programs. The board adjourned shortly after the report.
