Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident contests law director memo on 328 Bassett zoning and alcohol-sale restrictions
Summary
Public commenter Mr. Majewski argued that historic minutes and ordinances show 328 Bassett has a longstanding retail/nonconforming use and that a law director memo misapplies Ohio case law regarding alcohol-sale restrictions; the law director's interpretation was disputed during audience comment and council discussion.
In the audience portion, Mr. Majewski challenged the law director's memo regarding zoning at 328 Bassett Road and argued the Village Rose Deli's use is a grandfathered retail operation in a residential zone. He cited BZA and council minutes from 1979 through the 1990s and the Bay Village codified ordinance section (11.73) about permitted retail uses, contending the memo's reliance on an Ohio Supreme Court precedent was not applicable to this property's long-held use.
A law-office representative or municipal official responded that the cited Westlake case eliminates use of code provisions to prohibit on-premises alcohol consumption and maintained the memo's legal interpretation; the planner in the meeting countered that grandfathered uses persist until cessation. Council acknowledged the disagreement and indicated it would consider questions from members before any formal action; the exchange included multiple direct legal claims and counterclaims rather than a formal vote on the zoning status during this session.
