Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Webster amends and approves resolution to oppose commercial developments that could compromise waterways

Town of Webster Board of Commissioners · June 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Town of Webster unanimously approved an amended resolution expanding an earlier opposition to a particular gas station into a broader stance against commercial developments that could harm Jackson County waterways.

The Town of Webster Board of Commissioners voted unanimously June 4 to approve an amended resolution opposing commercial developments that could compromise Jackson County waterways.

The board revised an April 2, 2025 resolution that had been specific to a proposed gas station along the Tuckasegee River so the language would apply more broadly to commercial developments near riparian zones and to increase transparency for public input. Commissioner Leigh Anne Young moved to approve the amended resolution; Commissioner Brandon Core seconded and the motion carried unanimously.

Mayor Tracy Rodes said the amended title and language were intended to address county-wide standards and public involvement rather than target a single business. The board also discussed potential regulatory changes to strengthen protections for waterways and to require clearer processes for community comment on projects affecting riparian areas.

The action followed earlier public concern about development near the Tuckasegee River and a presentation at the meeting by a contractor planning a station on Hwy 107. The board did not adopt specific ordinance text or regulatory language at the June 4 meeting; commissioners agreed to the amended resolution as a statement of policy and direction.

The resolution was passed unanimously; the board did not record roll-call votes by name in the minutes. The board scheduled follow-up discussion and potential drafting of specific ordinance language for future meetings.