Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Construction Management Contract topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dewey board approves Stout Construction as construction manager for Agricultural Education Building

Dewey Public Schools Board of Education · February 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Feb. 6 special session, the Dewey Public Schools Board voted 3-0 to approve a contract naming Stout Construction as construction manager for the district's Agricultural Education Building project; the contract amount was not specified in the record.

The Dewey Public Schools Board of Education voted 3-0 on Feb. 6 to approve a contract with Stout Construction to serve as the district’s construction management company for the Agricultural Education Building project. The motion was made by David Cleveland and seconded by Amanda Guilfoyle.

David Cleveland moved to “Approve a contract with Stout Construction to serve as the District's Construction Management company for the Agricultural Education Building project,” according to the meeting record; the vote listing David Cleveland, Amanda Guilfoyle and Amanda Nichols as voting yes carried the motion. The record does not specify a contract amount, timeline or funding source.

The action took place at a special session convened at 12:00 p.m. in the district administration building conference room. Three board members were present for the vote; two members (Julie Davis and Emily Case) were recorded as absent. The board did not discuss or enter details into the record about contract price, delivery schedule or required approvals from other agencies.

The board’s approval formally authorizes the district to engage Stout Construction as construction manager for the Agricultural Education Building project; subsequent procurement steps, contract execution and any required staff reports or authorization were not described in the minutes provided.