Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County auditor issues clean opinion but flags billing, compliance and reserve concerns
Summary
The county's external auditor delivered a clean opinion on the financial statements but noted recurring internal-control items: water/sewer rate input errors affecting billing, expenditures exceeding appropriations in some funds, gaps in opioid-abatement fiscal-agent reconciliations, and a significant drop in unassigned fund balance.
The county's external auditor told the board Smyth County received a clean (unmodified) independent auditors'opinion on the financial statements but that the financial report also includes recurring internal-control and compliance matters the county should address.
The auditor said the team recorded material proposed audit adjustments (largely related to converting cash-basis records to modified-accrual for report purposes) and identified an incorrect water/sewer rate that was input into the billing system, resulting in miscalculated bills in one tier for several months until corrected. The auditor told the board that management corrected the rate after testing flagged the issue.
Other compliance items included expenditures exceeding appropriations in the general and water/sewer funds and a noted deficiency in reconciliation and testing for opioid-abatement funds where the county serves as fiscal agent. The auditor also described a school-board check cut in June and not released until October related to science-lab cabinets, and advised against cutting checks until release is approved.
The audit presentation included a warning about reserve levels: the county's unassigned fund balance dropped significantly in the reporting period, and the auditor recommended monitoring appropriations and bringing reserves back toward recommended benchmarks (GFOA ~17%; auditor suggested aiming closer to ~25% depending on comfort with risk).
Board members asked whether auditors could post journal entries to help the county view accrual-based balances midyear; the auditor said external consultants usually post those entries but that auditors can supply recommended adjustments to the consultants and staff for posting.
Why it matters: a clean audit opinion affirms the financial statements are materially correct, but the identified control and compliance items involve ongoing operational risks (billing accuracy, appropriations monitoring, and grant reconciliation) that could affect budgets and public trust if not addressed.
What's next: the auditor said staff should consider posting a subset of accrual adjustments to improve midyear financial visibility, and the board's budget committee said it will review recommendations during upcoming budget work sessions.
