Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Virginia Tech finds industrial scenarios offer fastest payback for Pathway Park; Route 11 entrance needed for Tier 5
Summary
Virginia Tech presented an ROI study for Pathway Park (46.2 developable acres), finding industrial uses aligned with Tobacco Commission/GO Virginia grants produce fiscal payback on the county's $5.8M investment within 5—to—10 years (3—to—5 with regional impacts); a Route 11 entrance redesign is required for Tier 5 readiness.
Virginia Tech economist Ashley Poschimus presented an ROI assessment of Pathway Park, telling the Smyth County Board the study focused on 46.2 developable acres and modeled five industrial development scenarios. She said the analysis centered on three target clusters — advanced manufacturing, food and beverage, and plastics/chemical manufacturing — that align with the grant conditions attached to Tobacco Commission and GO Virginia funding.
"The key remaining hurdle is the Route 11 entrance redesign, which is improvement that's needed to reach Tier 5 readiness status," Poschimus said, and she emphasized the study intentionally limited its scenarios to industrial uses because the grants that helped prepare the site carry use restrictions.
The study modeled single- and multi-tenant uses. Under a mid-size advanced-manufacturing scenario the report estimated about 350 jobs and roughly $500,000 in annual tax revenue; across modeled scenarios Virginia Tech found the county's $5,800,000 investment could be repaid within a 5—to—10-year window on fiscal revenues alone, and in many cases the regional economic ripple effects shrink payback to roughly 3—to—5 years.
Board members pressed on feasibility. One supervisor asked whether reuse or recycling facilities were considered; Poschimus replied those sub-industries did not emerge as high-ROI fits for this site and that water, air and other resource demands would require further study. County staff reported there are three active prospects and one planned pitch, and said the report is meant to help narrow recruitment to industries most likely to deliver the modeled returns.
Why it matters: the analysis clarifies which uses meet grant restrictions and offers the board concrete payback estimates tied to the county's prior investments. At the same time, supervisors raised questions about workforce and housing availability, and whether the county should revisit site covenants if industrial prospects do not materialize within a reasonable timeframe.
What's next: the study recommends pursuing the Route 11 entrance redesign to reach Tier 5 readiness and refining recruitment to the target clusters identified in the report.
