Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities Rate Case topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tompkins County presses NYSEG on rate case, transparency and rising bills
Summary
Tompkins County officials and residents pressed NYSEG at a Feb. 17 legislature meeting over steep recent bills, denied remote access to a litigated rate hearing in Albany, and debated the utility’s multi‑billion dollar investment plan and its effects on local affordability and reliability.
Tompkins County officials and residents on Feb. 17 challenged NYSEG over rising utility bills and a rate case now moving into a litigated evidentiary hearing in Albany.
Terry Carroll, Tompkins County chief sustainability officer, summarized the county’s participation in the proceeding and said the county submitted testimony focused on affordability, demand management, battery storage and heat‑pump rates. Carroll also criticized the process’s transparency: "That was denied," he said of the county’s request for remote observation of the Albany hearing, adding the county and several other parties filed a reconsideration that was also denied.
The hearing’s location and limits on remote participation mean, Carroll warned, "unless you're able to go to Albany for 4 weeks straight every day starting at 09:30, you are not participating in this case." He said the county plans to file a post‑hearing brief and continue advocating for affordability measures.
NYSEG representatives gave an extended presentation explaining the components of a customer bill and the company’s rate filing. Tim Ellis, NYSEG vice president for state government relations, said delivery charges — the portion regulated through the rate case — cover investments in poles, wires and other local infrastructure. Pat Fox, NYSEG senior director for energy services, described an unprecedented recent run of cold weather that pushed wholesale energy prices sharply higher, and he said hedging has limited some exposure for the standard residential tariff but not for day/night customers.
Several legislators pressed NYSEG on deferred maintenance, vegetation management and whether past rate settlements allowed the company to keep up with infrastructure replacement. County legislators cited staff findings and public filings that, they said, showed investments either delayed or billed inconsistently in prior cases. In reply, NYSEG said its parent company has contributed capital in recent years and defended the need for a multi‑year investment plan to support electrification and reliability.
Public commenters, including several residents who said their recent bills rose substantially, urged stronger consumer protections. Ron Hunt of Danby told the legislature his most recent bill was "over $1,500" and said his kilowatt‑hour charge had risen roughly 167% compared with earlier years while his household consumption had fallen.
The legislature did not take formal action on the rate case at the meeting, but members said they would continue to press state regulators and to seek more local options for customer support, including outreach, energy‑efficiency education and targeted arrears assistance.
