Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves Peek Farm rezone after debate over road width and patio‑home density
Summary
After a public hearing and public safety concerns, the South Weber Planning Commission approved rezoning about 35.66 acres at 898 E. 7240 S. from Agricultural to a mix of RL‑M, R‑M and R‑P by a 3–1 vote, with commissioners split over the proposed patio‑home density and road cross‑section.
The South Weber Planning Commission on Nov. 13 approved a zoning‑map amendment for the Peek Farm property at approximately 898 E. 7240 S., changing roughly 35.66 acres from A (Agricultural) to a mix of RL‑M (15.07 acres), R‑M (8.60 acres) and R‑P (11.99 acres). The motion to approve passed 3 to 1 after a public hearing that raised concerns about roadway width and pedestrian safety.
Community Development Manager Lance Evans told the commission the requested map amendment aligns with the city’s General Plan and that staff shifted the higher‑density R‑P toward the east to create a transition to adjacent properties. He explained that the Browning purchase (about 6.8 acres) was included in the application so the rezoning would reflect the long‑term zoning pattern for the full parcel. "He added it will reflect what the long-term zoning would be for this property," the record states.
Several residents addressed the commission during the public hearing. According to the transcript, Lynn Poll "has no problem with the rezone request, but he does have a problem with a 70’ wide road, and larger park strips," and Traci Wiese "expressed safety concerns for children crossing South Weber Drive to get to the elementary school." Natalie Browning said she is purchasing approximately 6.8 acres of the property and discussed that with the applicant representative; staff advised including that acreage in the request to reflect future zoning.
Commissioners debated the merits of the R‑P (residential patio) designation. Commissioner Gary Boatright said he does not favor the R‑P zone, and Commissioner Julie Losee questioned what the city would receive to justify the higher density. Commissioner Marty McFadden and Commissioner Chris Roberts voiced support for patio homes as a housing option. The transcript records two approval attempts: an initial motion failed when the vote split 2–2; a subsequent motion passed with Commissioners Boatright, McFadden and Roberts voting aye and Commissioner Losee voting nay.
The commission’s action was procedural approval of the zoning map amendment; the record notes that, if the Browning property continues agricultural operations with proof of production, it may remain a legal nonconforming use despite rezoning. The project will proceed to any required administrative steps and future permits tied to subdivision or development applications.
