Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debate over metal panels spotlights gap in Gateway Historic guidelines
Summary
Commissioners spent much of the Long Range Shooters review debating whether modern ACM (aluminum composite material) panels fit Alpine’s Gateway Historic District intent. Several commissioners argued consistency is critical; others said careful detailing can make ACM acceptable as a complement to brick and wood.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Alpine City Planning Commission’s discussion on June 16 exposed a recurring issue: the city’s Gateway Historic District design guidelines encourage traditional primary materials—stone, brick, wood or stucco—yet do not explicitly anticipate newer products such as ACM metal panels.
Commissioner Jeff Davis emphasized consistency with the design work city stakeholders have completed in recent years, saying the commission should not “throw out all the effort” by approving materials that depart from the established look. Staff confirmed the guidelines encourage the listed materials and offer discretion to consider "innovative use of other materials that mimic the primary exterior materials." Other commissioners, including Greg Butterfield and Sue Wittenberg, noted existing local examples where metal accents have been used and said a carefully detailed ACM treatment can complement brick and black‑framed windows.
Applicant representatives said ACM can be fabricated to complement traditional elements and argued for the material’s durability in Alpine’s climate. The split in opinion led commissioners to approve the Long Range Shooters recommendation while flagging the policy point: the guidelines’ language does not name ACM and the commission may want to clarify the ordinance or the small‑area plan going forward.
Commissioners asked staff to present clearer, codified material guidance in future ordinance amendments so design review is more predictable and consistently applied across applicants.

