Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreation Enterprise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposal to cut ice‑rink subsidy to $55,000 fails after heated debate
Summary
A motion to lower the town subsidy for the rink enterprise fund to $55,000 drew sharp exchange over who should pay for ice time; after discussion the committee voted and the motion failed in roll call.
Committee members debated whether the rink enterprise fund should be asked to increase user fees or continue to receive a larger town subsidy. A committee member argued that recreational users should bear more of the cost: "Should my time at the ice rink when I'm curling be on the backs of the taxpayers, or should it be on me?" the Committee member asked, urging a reduction in the town contribution.
Staff cautioned that the enterprise fund’s revenue projections and pricing schedule are set by the rink board and that reducing the town subsidy would either require higher rates or drawing on unrestricted fund balance. The motion to cut the subsidy to $55,000 was put to a roll call and did not pass; multiple members said they preferred preserving the current level of funding to support programming and traditions.
