Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RDA staff outlines 40 recommended updates to participation programs and TIF processes
Summary
Redevelopment staff and consultants presented a package of program‑level updates — from standardized program rules and predevelopment eligibility to consultant cost recovery and stricter readiness rules for gap financing — and the council directed staff to draft formal language for review by the redevelopment advisory board and council.
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Reno redevelopment staff and consultant SB Friedman presented a comprehensive update July 29 proposing roughly 40 changes to how the agency evaluates and administers tax‑increment financing (TIF) and program grants. Recommendations include standardizing eligibility and documentation for small‑grant programs (Restore, ReSecure, small‑walls), requiring stronger applicant readiness and validated construction pricing for gap financing requests, clarifying prevailing‑wage expectations for any portion of a project funded by TIF, and introducing consultant‑fee recovery for third‑party underwriting (suggested $10,000 application fee to offset analysis costs).
Staff and the redevelopment advisory board proposed clearer expiration rules for incomplete applications, a public‑improvement‑only gap option, and tighter processes around property acquisition, disposition and performance milestones. The council discussed the role of the advisory board in review versus items that should appear on the consent agenda; staff will implement a bright line that consent‑agenda items bypass RAB review to improve efficiency but will return formalized program text for RAB review and a final council vote.
Council members stressed transparency, avoidance of retroactive TIF for completed projects, and stronger clawback/performance language. The council voted to direct staff to draft the formal program language and return it to the RAB for recommendation before final adoption by the council.

