Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Albany County approves LaVella contract for countywide comprehensive plan after debate on climate, regional coordination and planning horizon
Summary
The committee approved a contract with LaVella Associates to craft a 20-year-plus county comprehensive plan after staff said LaVella won an eight‑respondent RFP; members pressed for scenario planning, integration with a separate climate action plan, municipal outreach and periodic reporting to the legislature.
Albany County’s conservation and planning officials received committee authorization to contract with LaVella Associates to produce a countywide comprehensive plan described by staff as a “20 year plus vision plan.”
“We're hoping to do a comprehensive plan for the county which is a 20 year plus vision plan, looking at sort of land uses, housing, transportation, conservation, parkland,” said Ann Marie Zeman, the department director, describing the scope. Staff told the committee the RFP drew eight respondents and that LaVella was selected after a competitive process.
Committee members pressed staff and the consultant-selection rationale on several fronts. One member, identifying themselves as a city and regional planner, asked whether the consultants would model multiple future scenarios given that major changes could occur during a multi‑decade horizon — ‘‘Are they looking at these scenarios? Are they going to say ... how do we plan for these alternative futures?’’ the member asked. Staff said the comprehensive plan and a concurrently developed climate action plan are intended to be complementary, and that the climate plan will address many resilience and energy issues in more detail.
Another member urged regular engagement with county legislators and suggested a formal process for elected representatives to contribute local knowledge. Staff said they have already spoken with municipal technical planners and regional organizations (including CDRPC and regional transportation planners) and plan to use technical review committees and multiple public-input sessions across the county. When asked whether the consultant will report periodically versus only delivering a single final product, staff said the committee will determine a reporting cadence and that reporting will not be limited to one final recommendation.
After discussion, a motion to approve the LaVella contract was made, seconded and carried by voice vote. The transcript records members’ questions about scope, scenario planning, energy policy and engagement; staff said the county will own the plan and the data and may reprocure updates in the future.
