Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Evaluation Feedback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs targeted feedback and 360 approaches for superintendent evaluation
Summary
Members discussed soliciting targeted feedback for the superintendent evaluation—direct reports, principals and possibly sampled teachers or community stakeholders—using anonymous surveys aligned to evaluation standards.
Get email alerts on the Evaluation Feedback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members discussed using a targeted feedback process to inform the superintendent evaluation. Options included a formal anonymous survey of direct reports and principals, plus a limited random sample of teachers at each building to surface quietly circulating concerns; the board emphasized that survey questions should align directly with the standards they choose to prioritize.
Members also discussed logistics (SurveyMonkey/Google Forms for anonymous collection), sample sizes, and how to synthesize results into usable trends for evaluators. The board agreed in principle to pursue targeted feedback and to finalize the who/how at a later meeting, giving staff time to prepare survey materials.

