Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ridgefield Park Rec Board examines background-check vendors, considers continuous monitoring and fingerprinting

Board of Recreation, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey · January 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board discussed vendor options for background checks, noting some recommended providers lacked monthly follow-up; Protect Youth Sports offers continuous monitoring but is not on the state-approved list, and Instant Verification (fingerprinting) was discussed as an alternative.

During old business the Ridgefield Park Board of Recreation reviewed background-check options for coaches and volunteers and the possibility of an ordinance to standardize checks. The minutes say two companies suggested by the town attorney do not perform monthly monitoring; the board discussed Protect Youth Sports (used by Fort Lee), which offers continuous monitoring for 12–24 months, but noted the village attorney said it is not on the state-approved list.

The board also considered Instant Verification for fingerprinting (recommended by Wood-Ridge Recreation) and said GJEM Insurance would provide additional information gathered at a recent safety meeting. A board member (Enzo) described local coaching practices of fingerprinting plus name checks every two years. Commissioners discussed the need to decide what type of background check a municipal ordinance should require.