Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pediatric Exclusivity topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

FDA: pediatric exclusivity extends exclusivity but not the patent; labeling carve-outs end when patent expires

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Generic Drug Policy · July 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Strandberg explained that pediatric exclusivity adds six months to certain exclusivities but does not extend a patent, so Section 8 labeling carve-outs tied to a patent end when the patent expires and labeling must be revised to add back protected information.

Heather Strandberg summarized the agency's position on pediatric exclusivity: it is "a 6 month extension of the period during which the approval of an ANDA may not be made effective," and is treated as an extension of exclusivity rather than as a patent extension. "The period is added to the end of certain listed patents and exclusivities, but there's an important difference between the two," she said.

As a result, Strandberg said an applicant that submitted a Section 8 statement to omit patent-protected information must revise ANDA labeling to add back the omitted information once the patent expires, even if a pediatric-exclusivity period remains. She used a hypothetical with a patent expiring 04/01/2026 and pediatric exclusivity through 10/01/2026 to illustrate that a Section 8 statement does not extend through pediatric exclusivity.