Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Remedies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minnesota's ban includes civil penalties and multiple enforcement options, sponsors say
Summary
Senators said the law creates civil penalties and authorized county attorneys, city attorneys, the attorney general, or prosecutors to pursue cases against companies; sponsors and survivors discussed limits of retroactive relief.
Sen. McQuaid described the law's enforcement design, saying it provides civil penalties and a civil right of action that local actors can use to hold companies accountable. "There are civil penalties available to people and I think there's, what, 3 different options for people to use. So it's your county attorney, your city attorney, the attorney general, and the prosecutor," she said.
Speakers acknowledged that the law would not retroactively repair harms already suffered by survivors but said upstream civil remedies could deter future misuse by making companies financially accountable. Advocates warned that takedown and downstream remedies remain resource-intensive and that civil enforcement depends on the capacity of local prosecutors and attorneys general to pursue cases. Survivors said access to justice can be limited by time, money, and legal savvy, and sponsors said civil penalties were included to increase companies' accountability where criminal prosecutions may be difficult.
