Council debates mayor's appointment of police chief; city attorney and councilors differ on whether confirmation is required

A written communication from Mayor Mitchell stating that his appointment of the new police chief is not subject to City Council confirmation set off an extended debate on procedure, charter authority and accountability.

Councilor Ryan Perera and others argued the traditional process requires the mayor to submit department-head appointments to the council for approval; Councilor Linda Morad called the administration's letter "the most stupid thing I've seen in my 20 years here" and urged the council to insist on confirmation. Attorney Geratowski, speaking for the council's legal perspective in this session, said: "It's my opinion that you cannot be installed as the chief of police department unless he is confirmed by the city council." He advised that while the mayor has given the chief operational authority, that installation may be inconsistent with the charter and ultimately a court could decide the dispute.

After debate, Councilor Gomes moved (and the council seconded) a motion for no further action on the mayor's letter; the body adopted that motion by voice vote, meaning the council did not accept the mayor's communication as a basis to cede confirmation authority. Several councilors said they remain prepared to hold a confirmation hearing if the mayor formally submits an appointment.