Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Principals tell New London board Plan B would be "devastating" to schools as budget options are weighed

New London Board of Education · February 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Building principals told the New London Board of Education on Feb. 19 that the district's Plan B (the "Revenue Match" model) would be "devastating to the buildings," affecting programming and school climate as the board continued deliberations on the FY2026'027 budget and scheduled a public hearing for March 2.

Building principals told the New London Board of Education on Feb. 19 that the district's Plan B, the so-called "Revenue Match" model, would be "devastating to the buildings, not only for programming but also for the climate and culture of the staff, students and buildings as a whole." The comments came during a continuation of the NLPS proposed FY2026'027 budget presentation.

Superintendent Dr. Cynthia Ritchie and cabinet staff reviewed three pathways for the FY2026'027 budget: Plan A ("Same Service"), Plan B ("Revenue Match"), and Plan C (a district consolidation and reinvestment model emphasizing academic excellence and operational efficiency). Dr. Ritchie invited building principals Bryan Mahon (New London High School Multi-Magnet Campus), Chris Vamvakides (Bennie Dover Jackson Multi-Magnet Middle School Campus), Erin McGuire (Acting Principal, Nathan Hale Arts Magnet School), and Mike Podeszwa (Winthrop STEM Elementary Magnet School) to describe building-level impacts.

According to the principals, significant cuts tied to Plan B would harm curricular programming and would erode staff and student morale. The principals shared the district-level presentation to highlight trade-offs and to make the board aware of the operational consequences of different budget choices. The board did not take action at the meeting and instead set a Special Meeting and public hearing for March 2 to continue deliberations.

The board's presentation materials were described as the "NLPS Proposed FY2026-2027 Budget Book," which outlines options and probable outcomes; cabinet staff remained available to answer clarifying questions. The board also noted a State Public Hearing on the state budget scheduled for March 4 and encouraged public testimony in support of educational funding. No vote on a budget pathway occurred at the Feb. 19 meeting.