Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Coordinator topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legal counsel: Title 16 gives superintendent appointment power; board may set reporting structure for coordinator
Summary
Attorney Rappaport told the Providence School Board that the state's Title 16 delegates appointment power to the superintendent, but the board can determine reporting lines and day-to-day direction for a board coordinator. He framed the commissioner's prior declaratory comments as advisory rather than an absolute ban on a coordinator who works with board leadership.
Get email alerts on the Board Coordinator topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Attorney Rappaport gave a detailed legal explanation after the board moved item 3.3 for discussion, describing the origin of a petition for declaratory relief and the two bullets in President Stevens's earlier document that triggered the filing: reallocating about $130,000 from a planned labor and employment counsel to support board employment, and that the coordinator "should report directly to the Providence School Board."
Rappaport told the board that the commissioner had emphasized the superintendent's appointment power under Title 16 but did not rule that a coordinator could not "directly report to or directly support the board." He explained that "the superintendent retains the appointment power in a manner that's consistent with district practices, namely, you have an interview, you have an interview committee, you have input by stakeholders." He said the proposed coordinator would take day-to-day direction from board leadership while remaining appointed and evaluated through the superintendent's usual processes.
On legal risk, Rappaport said the commissioner could file suit or the issue could be re-litigated, and that the declaratory-order process as administered may not develop a robust factual record. He urged the board that, if constrained by future rulings, the board should consider challenging such rulings outside the commissioner's advisory context. The attorney framed the current course — appointment and evaluation consistent with district practice, and day-to-day direction from board leadership — as a workable administrative approach.

