Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee holds community protection fund bill after questioning oversight and funding

Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee · September 26, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CB87-2024 would create a non-lapsing Community Protection and Preservation Fund to finance community- and violence-intervention programs administered by the county. Staff and budget analysts said no dedicated funding source is specified; the committee agreed to hold the bill to align administration and council on oversight and funding.

The committee discussed CB87-2024, which would establish a Community Protection and Preservation Fund to support Prince George's County organizations that focus on violence prevention and community safety. The draft creates the fund as a non-lapsing county account and names the Chief of Police as responsible for administration and annual reporting in the current text.

Budget staff (Roger Benagas) told the committee draft 1 includes no dedicated funding source, so the direct fiscal cost is unknown; however, he noted FY25 budget increases in police program funding (for example, $495,600 and $100,000 figures cited for some programs). Sponsor Councilmember Hawkins said the fund is intended to support community violence-intervention efforts and that organizations would apply with plans and budgets; the chief or a liaison would review submissions and allocate awards. Joel Peoples (speaker 16) and the sponsor emphasized vetting organizations and yearly reporting to measure program effectiveness.

Several committee members and the County Executive's liaison (Miss Skinner) questioned whether the police department should administer the fund, citing capacity concerns; they suggested alternatives such as the health department or department of social services. The sponsor agreed to return with clearer parameters on oversight and funding sources. The committee moved to hold CB87 for further discussion so administration and council can align; the motion carried.