Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves alcohol‑distance variance for warehouse liquor wholesaler near church after debate

Garland City Council · May 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted 7–2 to approve a variance allowing a wholesale alcohol storage/distribution use at 209 S. Kirby St. to operate 86 feet door‑to‑door from Nuevo Paco Christian Church; staff characterized the site as a warehouse with wholesale only, and council discussed deliveries and neighborhood suitability.

The Garland City Council on May 5 approved a requested variance that reduces the required 300‑foot separation between a church and an establishment associated with storing and distributing alcoholic beverages. The site at 209 South Kirby Street (Unit 307) was measured at 86 feet door‑to‑door from Unit 418, where Nuevo Paco Christian Church is located.

Planning staff said the unit operates as a warehouse with a wholesale component and has a certificate of occupancy for warehouse use; staff noted they mailed notification to properties within 400 feet and received two letters of opposition. Staff told council they had attempted courtesy phone contact with the church but had not received a response. Council members raised concerns about delivery traffic, whether semi‑truck access would be safe on local streets, and whether adequate outreach had occurred. Councilmember Dutton moved to deny the variance but the motion failed for lack of a second. Councilmember Bass then moved to approve the variance; the motion, seconded by Councilmember Beard, passed 7–2 with Dutton and Thomas recorded in opposition.

Staff recommended approval based on the character of the area and the use’s warehouse/wholesale nature; the applicant had obtained a CO but required TABC clearance before full operation. Council’s vote allows the business to proceed toward TABC approval but does not substitute for any state licensing requirement.