Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Calvert County work session moves to modernize animal ordinance with new licenses, containment and enforcement tools
Summary
County staff proposed comprehensive updates to Chapter 7 of the county code to add an "animal fancier" license for owners with six or more animals, require licensing for grooming businesses and rescues, clarify containment and tethering rules, set extreme-weather thresholds, and add a 'reckless owner' designation with appeal rights.
In a lengthy April 8 work session, Deputy Director April Coleman presented proposed revisions to Calvert County's animal ordinance designed to modernize oversight of animal care and enforcement.
"This new license category would be introduced for individuals who own 6 or more dogs, cats, or rabbits," Coleman said, explaining the draft also adds licenses for grooming facilities and nonprofit rescues and offers a three-year license option aligned with rabies vaccination schedules. The presentation framed licensing as a public-health and reunification tool and proposed fee structures intended to incentivize spay/neuter.
The draft would require disaster-preparedness contact information for license holders so animal services and first responders can coordinate during fires or evacuations, and would create a "reckless owner" designation for people with three or more Chapter 7 violations within 24 months. Coleman said the reckless-owner designation would bar possession of animals for up to four years, with appeal rights to the Animal Matters Hearing Board.
Commissioners pressed staff on farm and HOA impacts. Commissioner Hart asked whether the rules would unfairly burden agricultural uses, saying, "I just don't want the farmer that goes, you know, I could really help these animals. I got a big spot to run, but they get—" Coleman answered that the county will consider separate residential and farm licensing categories and review neighboring jurisdictions' approaches.
The packet also includes containment and care standards: stronger perimeter-fence or secure-kennel requirements for animals deemed potentially dangerous; limits on relying solely on electric or wireless fences for containment; restricted long-term unsupervised tethering while allowing short-term supervised tethering; and explicit extreme-weather thresholds (discussed in the draft as wind chill of 32°F or below and a heat index of 90°F or above) to trigger animal-safety requirements. Coleman said the measures aim to reduce preventable suffering and public-safety incidents.
Staff also proposed procedural changes for impoundment and reclamation: animals impounded twice in 12 months would require spay/neuter before reclaiming in many cases and owners with ordinance violations in the prior two years would need microchipping before reclaiming animals. To address fiscal strain in long investigations, the draft introduces a cost-of-care provision requiring prepayment in 30-day increments while cases are pending; staff cited past lengthy stays and restitution amounts (examples: Skye restitution sought $4,767; Roxy restitution sought $3,657) to illustrate shelter costs.
Coleman told the board she will revise ordinance language to separate 'fancier' versus 'commercial' licensing and return with proposals for public advertisement and hearings. The board provided direction to continue refining the draft with county-attorney review and broader outreach before a formal public hearing.
