Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Tax Rate topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

El Paso County publishes voter-approval tax-rate ceiling, sets Aug. 17 public hearing

El Paso County Commissioners Court · August 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff presented midyear budget results and projected rates; the Commissioners Court voted to publish the voter-approval ceiling (0.504717 per $100) to preserve flexibility while finalizing the FY27 budget and scheduled a public hearing for Aug. 17 at 5:30 p.m.

The El Paso County Commissioners Court this week voted to publish a proposed voter-approval tax-rate ceiling of 0.504717 per $100 of assessed value and scheduled a public hearing for Aug. 17 at 5:30 p.m. Budget director Carmen Arita Candelaria told the court the calculation reflects certified 2026 taxable values and provides a ceiling the court can use during the FY27 budget process.

"So 1st, we have our no new revenue rate for 2026.... our M and O rate... is 0.388134... for a total rate of 0.451133," Carmen Arita Candelaria said while explaining rate options for the court. Commissioners discussed the trade-off between publishing the voter-approval ceiling (which gives maximum flexibility) and public communication concerns; a majority approved publishing the voter-approval rate, with one commissioner recorded as voting against the motion. The court amended the public-hearing time to 5:30 p.m. to accommodate residents who work daytime hours.

Candelaria and budget staff also presented a preliminary FY27 budget book showing a recommended total budget of about $696.8 million, including proposed COLA and step increases for many employee groups and an economic-impact fund allocation. Commissioners asked staff to return with additional detail on unfunded state mandates, the county's reliance on federal inmate revenue, and options to shift one-time dollars between the economic-impact fund and capital improvement program.