Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves consent agenda, interlocal agreement, bank contract extension, Head Start contract and TEA waivers

Floresville ISD Board of Trustees · June 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees approved the consent agenda and several items by 6–0: the consent agenda, the DAPEP interlocal agreement with neighboring districts, a two-year Wells Fargo depository extension, a Head Start contract with Innovative Network of Knowledge, Inc., and TEA low-attendance waivers for specific affected dates.

At the June 2 meeting the Floresville ISD Board of Trustees approved multiple routine and contract items by unanimous voice or show of hands.

The consent agenda (financials and routine items) was approved 6–0 after a motion by Miss Liana Martinez and a second by Miss Bonner Reed. The board then approved the disciplinary alternative education program (DAPEP) interlocal agreement for 2025–26 (administration advised a $40-per-day student rate and fee base by UIL classification) and a two-year extension of the district depository agreement with Wells Fargo (07/01/2025–06/30/2027) citing the district's District of Innovation flexibility. Both passed by vote of 6–0.

Trustees also approved a contract with Innovative Network of Knowledge, Inc. to support six Head Start classes for 3- and 4-year-olds for 2025–26 (administration cited a program figure of $300,000 during discussion). Finally, the board approved TEA low-attendance waivers requested to exclude instructional days affected by cold weather, a January flu outbreak and a May safety incident from ADA and FSP funding calculations; administration explained the waivers apply when attendance dropped at least 10 percentage points below the prior year's average for the affected day.

The meeting record shows each listed recommendation carried by a 6–0 vote; individual motions and seconders were recorded in the transcript for each item.