Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council divided over DOJ NIBIN modernization grant; debate centers on federal grant language and public-safety needs
Summary
Council split over whether to apply for a DOJ NIBIN modernization grant after members objected to language they say references immigration enforcement; supporters said losing NIBIN access would hamper investigations into shootings. The council debated alternatives for funding and legal implications before voting.
Council members engaged in an extended debate over whether the City should apply for a FY2026 DOJ NIBIN modernization grant to preserve local access to the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network. Opponents, including Council Member Chavez, said the NOFO’s language referencing immigration enforcement was dehumanizing and incompatible with the City’s values; Chavez said, “I will not be supporting this grant application today.”
Supporters and police officials argued that NIBIN helps investigators link shell casings to shootings and identify suspects more quickly. City legal staff told the council their review of the NOFO found no requirement that the City perform federal immigration enforcement or violate the City’s separation ordinance. Council members debated alternatives for funding (including reallocating department overtime or general funds) if the council chose not to accept federal funds. Following public discussion and legal clarification, the council proceeded with a recorded vote on the item.
