Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Progress Monitoring topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ad hoc committee urges board to make student-outcomes monitoring central to meetings

San Francisco Board of Education · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The ad hoc committee recommended the board increase monitoring frequency, adopt a multiyear governance calendar, convert reports to slide decks with appendices, submit technical questions in advance, and train members to ask strategic questions focused on the superintendent’s strategy and student outcomes.

The board's ad hoc committee on progress monitoring presented a gap analysis and a set of procedural recommendations designed to make student-outcomes monitoring the core of board governance. "Progress monitoring is a formative evaluation of the superintendent," the committee chair said, and recommended boards spend substantially more meeting time on strategic goal monitoring, with staff providing slide-deck reports and a neutral coordinator compiling cross-departmental evidence.

Recommendations included a multiyear monitoring calendar (aiming for monitoring roughly quarterly), a requirement that strategic questions be asked to the superintendent while technical/tactical questions be submitted in advance, and a vote on whether to accept monitoring reports as part of superintendent evaluation. Commissioners debated whether to use dedicated monitoring meetings or integrate monitoring across business meetings and emphasized the need to link monitoring reports to budget/resource evidence.