Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the RPP Application topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews RPP application plan for about 2,200 acres north of Eagle

Conservation Advisory Committee · January 22, 2026

Summary

Members discussed reviving the RPP (Recreation and Public Purposes) application for roughly 2,200 acres north of Eagle, described the need for a detailed concept plan, NEPA documentation, cost estimates and potential land-exchange pathways; staff to engage as the application is developed.

Chair described the Recreation and Public Purposes (RPP) application the city has on file covering roughly 2,200 acres north of Eagle and explained next steps to advance a formal submittal. The RPP requires a specific plan that lists proposed amenities (trails, parking, infrastructure), cost estimates, maintenance plans and a timeframe; the committee discussed preparing those details in parallel with the parks and recreation master plan.

"So this is for that 2,200 acres that's directly in the north of, North of Eagle," Chair said, framing the geographic scope. Members noted BLM remains a necessary partner: the committee previously submitted an Eagle Foothills concept plan (2022) to BLM and will now work toward a more detailed application suitable for an exchange or acquisition process. The Chair said private groups (referred to as Valanova/Valanova-associated group) have initiated a land-exchange submission that could affect the transfer timeline.

Committee members emphasized that the RPP process is lengthy—requiring NEPA and engineering diagrams—and recommended the group focus on a sufficiently detailed concept (not a high-level concept) that includes major infrastructure and budget estimates to improve the city's position in an exchange or application review. The committee asked staff to coordinate stakeholder input and return with a process timeline and list of required deliverables.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source