Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Teacher Prep topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes teacher-preparation bill after failed amendment to remove new assessment
Summary
The House passed House File 2230, which increases clinical practicum requirements for teacher candidates and retains a proposed end-of-program summative assessment after an amendment to remove the test failed on a 31–64 roll call.
House File 2230, a measure to revise teacher preparation and licensing requirements, passed the Iowa House after floor debate Wednesday.
Representative Ingalls opened discussion, saying, "House file 22 30 relates to teacher prep programs and would require that all students have at least 15 practicum hours focused on differentiation of instruction and support for special populations, including ELL, special education, instructional implementation, and IEP progress monitoring." The bill also includes a requirement that teacher candidates take an end-of-program summative assessment with remediation opportunities.
An amendment (H8250) to remove the summative assessment was offered. Representative Matson argued against the assessment, saying the Department of Education's novice teacher survey did not indicate a need and raising cost concerns: "I am concerned that students would end up paying approximately a $150 for a test that in my opinion is not a good use of their time." Representative Ingalls and other supporters said the assessment could have beneficial outcomes and recommended allowing implementation and evaluation. The amendment failed on a roll-call vote (ayes 31; no 64).
After further discussion highlighting the bill's expanded clinical hours, Representative Fayett closed remarks in support and moved the bill. The House recorded 94 ayes, 2 no votes and 4 not voting; the bill was declared passed.
The debate separated provisions that increase practicum experience—widely supported—from the assessment component, which drew the primary dissent. The House did not adopt the amendment to remove the assessment; supporters said remediation provisions and practical clinical hours would better prepare candidates, while opponents warned of cost and insufficient evidence of need.
