Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enforcement Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Complainant urges PDC to increase suspended fines, says current penalties act as 'indulgences'
Summary
Connor Edwards told the Commission penalties are too small and suspended portions often fail to motivate compliance; he recommended larger suspended penalties and stronger collection efforts so fines are meaningful deterrents.
Connor Edwards, who is recorded in the meeting as a complainant in one of the staff cases, addressed commissioners during public comment and urged the agency to increase both the overall penalties and the suspended portions so they serve as a meaningful deterrent.
Edwards said, "These fines effectively serve as indulgences," arguing that low suspended amounts and weak collection make noncompliance a manageable cost of doing business. He suggested raising suspended penalties—for example, imposing larger suspended sums that would become expensive if respondents fail to come into compliance—and said the agency appears not to pursue collections vigorously enough.
Edwards also criticized the agency's recurring practice of resolving late C3 and C4 complaints with warning letters rather than enforceable penalties when filings are completed after an election, saying that disclosure after the fact does not serve voters. He urged the Commission to consider policy changes so disclosure obligations have meaningful pre‑election effect.
