Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident objects to stadium items on consent calendar, citing large expenditures and labor concerns
Summary
Public commenter Chris Robles objected to consolidating stadium-related expenditures and a stadium operating agreement on the consent calendar, saying the items warranted public discussion and citing a multi-hundred-million-dollar figure he calculated.
Chris Robles (speaker 10) objected to the council's consolidation of several stadium-related items on the consent calendar. He told the council: "The Brown Act specifically says that the public has a right to speak on every item on the agenda. The consent is not an item." Robles said he spoke on items 14, 16 and 18 and calculated what he described as large expenditures in the packet, at one point referencing "$444,100,000" in item 14 and raising concerns about expanded construction hours, additional construction costs and the Stadium Operating Agreement's lack of provisions on concession pricing and wages.
Mayor and council then moved the consent calendar (motion by Bowman, second by Macias) and recorded an electronic vote. The meeting record later notes the vote as passing with recusal clarifications for two members; the transcript does not record extended debate on the specific stadium contract terms during the consent vote.
Robles's objection placed spotlight on transparency and the use of consent calendars for major expenditures; the transcript records his claim but no detailed staff or council responses addressing the specific stadium cost calculations during the consent vote.
