Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Regional economic development group pitches VA—s Heartland Alliance, asks counties to consider $2.50 per-residence fee

Amelia County Board of Supervisors · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Alex McCoy of Virginia's Heartland Alliance described a regional economic-development effort, grant-supported feasibility work and a proposed $2.50 per-residence annual membership fee; he invited Amelia County to join regional site and business-park studies and potential EDA/Tobacco Commission grant work.

Alex McCoy (S12), executive director of the Virginia's Heartland Regional Economic Development Alliance (VAHA), presented the organization—s goals: build a regional identity, develop public-private partnerships, and pursue grant-supported site and business-park studies. He said a feasibility study and investor outreach shaped four core goals and that VAHA has begun business-retention-and-expansion visits and coordination with VEDP and Virginia Career Works.

McCoy described a proposed funding model of $2.50 per residence; using 2024 census population figures he cited, he said Amelia County—s share would be approximately $34,400 annually. He invited the board to participate in a pending regional grant and site-competitiveness study and noted VAHA has been recognized by the Virginia Economic Development Partnership as a regional economic development organization. Supervisors asked about value and geographic fit for Amelia and expressed both interest in grants and concern about return on investment for a small county.

Why this matters: regional economic-development partnerships can leverage state and federal grants and consultants that small counties cannot individually fund, but supervisors weighed the county—s likely return relative to the proposed dues.