Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sma Rules Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lānaʻi Planning Commission adopts changes to SMA rules, shifting minor‑permit decisions to local commission
Summary
After extended debate and public input, the Commission voted 5‑1 to change Special Management Area rules so the Commission — not the Planning Director — makes final determinations on SMA minor permits; the change also updates the SMA definition and assessment language.
The Lānaʻi Planning Commission on Feb. 18 voted to adopt amendments to Chapter 12‑402 of the County’s SMA rules that change the definition language, clarify assessment and determination duties, and move final authority over SMA minor permits from the Planning Director to the Commission.
Chair Reynold Gima framed the package as a local “home rule” measure, saying resident commissioners are more accountable to community impacts and better placed to decide small‑scale shoreland activities. The change requires the Department to place a complete SMA minor application on the Commission’s next available agenda for review; if the Commission does not act within 60 calendar days after the item is heard and public comments received, the proposed action is deemed approved with a minor permit.
The proposal drew detailed public testimony and debate. Dr. Keiki‑Pua Dancil of Pulama Lānaʻi sought clearer process language; staff explained that the Department would no longer unilaterally approve minor permits and would instead bring completed applications to the Commission for final action. Testifying policy advisor Sally Kaye said the amendments clarify alignment with State SMA law and remove an overly broad “all proposed actions” assessment requirement. Commissioners weighed practical impacts — enforcement of one‑time events, the landowner’s role in issuing right‑of‑entry, and a pending state case over who determines exemptions. Ultimately the motion to adopt the Commission‑led minor‑permit procedure and related edits passed 5‑1 (N. Alboro dissenting). The department’s recommended phrasing tweaks (e.g., requiring placement of a “complete application” on the “next available Commission meeting”) were incorporated.
Commissioners and staff agreed that secondary procedural issues — public awareness, Pulama’s right‑of‑entry practice, and enforcement logistics — will need continued interagency and community work even after the rule change.
