Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stanfield board debates state cell‑phone executive order and local enforcement plan

Stanfield School District 61 Board · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members and district staff discussed a recently issued executive order on student cell‑phone restrictions, weighing enforceability during passing times, buses and locker rooms and agreeing to finalize building protocols with staff during in‑service week.

The Stanfield School District 61 board reviewed a state executive order on student cell‑phone restrictions and discussed how the district will translate the OSBA draft policy into building‑level procedures.

Blaine, a district staff member, described staffing changes and sketched a proposed classroom approach: "So at the beginning of the period before the bell rings, kids are gonna have to shut them off, put them in their backpack. If they don't have a backpack or a purse, they can put them in the sleeves," Blaine said, arguing that clear sleeves or backpacks would make in‑class enforcement easier. District staff stressed that the OSBA draft, developed with ODE input, allows narrow curricular exceptions for activities like video editing.

Board discussion focused on the practicality of enforcement. A district staff member argued managers must define "instructional hours" consistently: the policy language as drafted counts only class time, not passing periods or lunch, which raised concerns about how a high school could enforce a ban during crowded passing times or on buses. On privacy and safety, one staff member warned, "No kids should have to worry about being filmed or photographed in a locker room," urging strong prohibitions where supervision is present.

Several board members and staff said staff buy‑in and training are essential before formal adoption. District staff recommended a series of staff meetings during in‑service week so individual schools can tailor protocols and to publish final building procedures afterward; "By Friday of in service week, you should kinda know where the staff has landed," a staff member said. The board did not adopt a final policy at the meeting and directed staff to return with recommended building protocols after in‑service discussions.

Why it matters: The executive order sets statewide expectations but leaves implementation details to districts. How Stanfield defines instructional hours, handles curricular exceptions and enforces violations (including parent pickup or loss of privileges) will shape students' school routines and staff workload this year.

Next steps: District staff will hold in‑service week meetings with teachers and propose building‑level protocols for board review after staff input is collected.