Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alternative Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District outlines hybrid Sequoia program to stem enrollment losses, pilot planned for fall
Summary
District staff and Sequoia program leaders proposed a hybrid learning model (on-site, online, proficiency‑based segments) to reengage students who left for charters/online/homeschooling; the pilot would begin with a small cohort (~30) and scale carefully if outcomes are positive.
Get email alerts on the Alternative Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jennifer Hannon, lead for Sequoia programming, presented a hybrid‑learning proposal aimed at reversing recent enrollment declines. The plan would offer a menu of six‑week alternative segments combining on‑site instruction, online courses from the district catalog, and proficiency‑based learning; students would remain part of the Fox/Falcon extracurricular communities. "Hybrid for us would be ideal for grades 7 to 11," Hannon said, adding that the district would screen applicants to ensure an environment appropriate to each student’s needs.
Kim Lisonbee, the superintendent, said state offices (ODE’s Alternative Pathways and Online Learning offices) are engaged and willing to let the district pilot the model. Hannon and staff estimate Sequoia can support roughly 30 students this fall without additional staff; beyond that, new positions or sections would be required. The proposed rollout includes targeted outreach (letters with QR‑coded applications) to students who left the district recently and a capped, phased opening (discussed cap figures included 30, 60, and 100 in board discussion) so the district can monitor student outcomes and adjust staffing.
Board members discussed budget implications, screening, and whether the hybrid model could be cost‑neutral as enrollment and per‑pupil funding change; finance staff said initial small cohorts could be managed within current capacity and that the program may pencil out as numbers increase. The board gave general support for a careful pilot and requested follow‑up materials on enrollment projections, staffing thresholds, and outcome metrics prior to formal adoption.

