Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Leaf Disposal topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rising leaf-disposal costs force Tenafly to weigh composting, trucking or resident pickup

Borough of Tenafly Mayor and Council ยท January 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff told the council capital and operating costs for a local leaf-composting facility may exceed earlier estimates, prompting discussions of trucking, equipment purchase, regional sharing, or asking residents to alter collection practices.

Town staff told the council state stormwater rules and updated load estimates make operating a local leaf-composting facility expensive and potentially infeasible at the current site. "We looked at this... a capital project was gonna be in excess of 1,000,000, maybe 1,000,000 and $0.5, and then the operating variables could be anywhere from 200,000 to 500,000 a year," the administrator said, summarizing prior contractor estimates and current budget implications.

The borough's recycling center site is about 3.5 acres and under current guidelines can handle roughly 9,000 cubic yards of leaves; staff reported Tenafly collected about 16,000 cubic yards in a recent season (compacted form), leaving a shortfall that would require trucking or a larger site. Council discussed options including requiring contractors to compact loads better, purchasing borough equipment to truck leaves out, negotiating regional sharing if a suitable site exists, or shifting collection responsibility toward residents (bagging or tax incentives). Members also emphasized public outreach and a newsletter survey before changing service levels.

Council asked staff to: (1) check whether other borough properties could host a permitted composting site; (2) assess capital and operating costs for a permitted facility versus purchasing equipment to truck leaves out; and (3) revise bid specifications to require better compaction from contractors. No final policy change was adopted at the meeting.