Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Textbook Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monroe board debates textbook definition and complaint process after challenged book removed from classroom
Summary
After a parent raised concerns and an age‑inappropriate book was removed from a middle‑school classroom, the board reviewed policies on what constitutes a "textbook," the formal complaint and appeals process, and proposed edits (including removing 'available') to clarify when board approval is required for permanent removal.
Board members reviewed a recent incident in which a book included in a classroom unit of study was flagged by a parent and taken out of circulation pending review. The board explored whether the material met the district policy definition of a "textbook" — which the policy describes as a principal source of instructional material "available or distributed to every student" — or instead was supplemental material available for a unit of study. One board member said, "So based on this policy, it it it reads like that fits in here," reflecting the ambiguity in current language and why the item was brought to the board for review.
Legal and administrative staff argued that supplemental materials not required of every student are usually not 'textbooks' and that the district's existing selection and review procedures should catch inappropriate materials; several members pressed for clearer procedure and documentation. After extended discussion, board members agreed to propose removing the word "available" (and consider removing "or") from policy 25.10 to narrow the textbook definition, and to clarify the appeals and permanent‑removal language in policy 91.30 so that temporary administrative removal would not itself be treated as final without board action. "So with that, is there any conversations of why or remember why 25 10 should not be put into, a 1st reading at our next board meeting for the removal of the 3 words that is available," a board member asked as the group moved toward placing that change on the agenda.
