Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rec Center Feasibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs scope and cost of recreation center and aquatics feasibility studies
Summary
Councilors debated whether to fund separate validation and aquatics studies or a combined feasibility study for a recreation center and indoor aquatics; consultant estimated a full combined study could start near $80,000–$90,000 while a narrower validation might fit a tentative $20,000 allocation.
Get email alerts on the Rec Center Feasibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members asked whether the city could combine an indoor aquatics study with a community recreation center feasibility and what that would cost. Consultant Mike Terrell recommended starting with a validation of existing studies and stakeholder convening for roughly the smaller $20,000 scope; he estimated a full combined feasibility and aquatics study would likely begin in the $80,000–$90,000 range.
Terrell explained the tradeoffs: a validation study can "take [a prior study] off the shelf" and confirm community needs, while a full aquatics feasibility requires specialized analysis (hydrology/site, pools and systems) and would be more costly. Councilor Leffridge said the community already signaled interest and asked how to integrate that demand without foreclosing opportunities; Terrell suggested a phased approach (validate then pursue stakeholders and additional funding) while noting combined studies cost more but can identify shared efficiencies (co-location, shared parking, operations).

