Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners split on using a roads mill levy; some press for alternative revenue sources
Summary
During discussion of the proposed roads mill levy, one commissioner argued the county should seek alternative revenue streams and noted that people from outside the county strain roads; others supported letting voters decide and noted the commission could levy less or withdraw the measure if alternatives emerge.
During deliberations on the proposed ballot measure, one commissioner argued at length that a mill levy may not be the best way to address road and park revenue needs and urged the commission to pursue alternative revenue streams and legislative solutions. The commissioner warned that visitor traffic is contributing to road wear, saying the county is being "loved to death by people outside the county."
Other commissioners said they had no objection to letting voters decide whether to authorize additional funds for roads. Commissioners also emphasized flexibility: staff and the chair said the commission can choose to levy less than the full $600,000 or withdraw the question if another revenue source is identified. The discussion concluded with a motion to place the measure on the ballot, which was seconded and declared passed after verbal ayes.
