Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elk Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Elko CAB affirms adaptive elk objectives after hours of presentations and public comment
Summary
After multi-hour biologist briefings and public testimony about wildfire and private‑land refugia, the Elko County Advisory Board to Manage Wildlife approved a mixed set of unit recommendations: several unit groups recommended for a 10% increase, Big 6 (062–068) left at the proposed adaptive objective, and 6171 retained with no change.
The Elko County Advisory Board to Manage Wildlife met for a full review of the Elk Management Committee report and voted on unit‑by‑unit population objectives after presentations from NDOW biologists and extended public comment.
Biologist Scott Roberts and area biologists provided the committee’s framing: the process adopts last year’s population estimates as the new baseline and permits annual adjustments within a plus-or-minus 10% adaptive range. Travis Allen, area 6 biologist, said the Bruno survey observed 1,678 elk and emphasized large cross‑boundary movements that limit Nevada’s available harvest: "We observed 1,678 elk on that survey." He and other staff repeatedly noted that some elk spend substantial time in Idaho or on the Duck Valley Indian Reservation, reducing the portion of the population available to Nevada hunters.
Public commenters and board members debated wildfire impacts and private‑land refugia. One public speaker who identified recent fires urged a 10% reduction in some units to protect seeded restoration areas; other commenters, including sportsmen, disputed the short‑term biological link and urged maintaining or increasing objectives to restore hunting opportunity.
After discussion, the CAB took motions unit‑by‑unit. Notable outcomes: the board voted to keep unit group 6171 at no change (motion carried 4–1); it left the Big 6 group (062–068) at the current proposed adaptive objective (motion carried 3–2); and it approved 10% increases for several other unit groups where biologists and local stakeholders supported higher adaptive objectives. The board recorded motions, seconds and voice tallies for each unit before finalizing its recommendations to NDOW.
NDOW staff said quotas and tag numbers will be set next month based on the adopted objectives and final harvest data. The board directed staff to file the unit recommendations with the commission for the upcoming season‑setting process.
