Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emerald Ash Borer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board asks Conservation Commission to study Emerald Ash Borer response, motion passes with recorded opposition
Summary
The Select Board voted to request the Conservation Commission research and recommend an Emerald Ash Borer preparedness initiative (public education, partnerships, management options). Members stressed limiting scope, inventorying hazardous roadside trees and coordination with utilities; the motion passed with at least two recorded opposing votes.
Get email alerts on the Emerald Ash Borer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Select Board discussed a draft letter and charge to the Conservation Commission asking it to research and recommend an Emerald Ash Borer preparedness initiative covering public education, partnership options and long‑term management. Board members emphasized the need for clear, achievable tasks: an inventory of hazardous roadside trees, coordination with utilities on trees near power lines, and public outreach to help homeowners address dying ash trees.
Select Board members debated scope and cost. One member cautioned that an inventory and large‑scale removals could be expensive and that the town should avoid assuming private property responsibilities. Another suggested the commission prioritize roads and public rights‑of‑way where falling trees pose roadside safety or power‑line risks. The board discussed potential role for regional partners (e.g., Upper Valley Lake Sunapee RPC) and methods to assist residents afford removal when appropriate.
After discussion, the board moved to request the Conservation Commission’s assistance in researching and developing recommendations for an Enfield Emerald Ash Borer preparedness initiative and to authorize the town manager to provide staff support and send the attached letter. The motion was seconded and carried; two members recorded opposition during the voice vote. The board directed staff and the commission to return with a scoped recommendation and prioritized list of roads/trees for possible action.

