Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident alleges mismanagement, targeted enforcement at Cusseta–Chattahoochee meeting; chairman denies wrongdoing
Summary
At the Nov. 12 commission meeting a resident, Warren Williams, alleged county mismanagement, retaliation and nepotism; Chairman Charles Coffey denied the tax-related allegations and said he serves the county out of public duty.
Warren Williams, speaking during public comment at the Nov. 12 meeting of the Commission of the Unified Government of Cusseta–Chattahoochee County, urged commissioners to address what he described as mismanagement and reprisals against citizens.
"It is not about race, color, gender, it is about human decency and respect and integrity," Williams said, accusing county leadership of fostering a "dark cloud" over the community and alleging targeted enforcement after he requested to be placed on an agenda. He also alleged nepotism and claimed more "girlfriends and boyfriends" were on county payroll than should be.
Commissioner Damon Hoyte thanked Williams and said retaliation would not be tolerated, saying he would investigate complaints. The panel did not take immediate action at the meeting on the accusations.
Chairman Charles Coffey responded directly to the allegations later in the meeting, saying he had filed for homestead on only one property and denying owing the county large sums. "It would be difficult for anyone to care more than I do for this county," Coffey said, and he told the commission that errors the assessor found affected multiple people, not just him.
The record shows no formal ethics investigation or personnel action was initiated at the Nov. 12 session; the county attorney said he is continuing to work with a cemetery committee on its ordinance and will follow up on other issues as appropriate. An appeal arising from a separate dispute involving Commissioner Hoyte and signage was noted elsewhere on the agenda and is scheduled for Dec. 6.
Why it matters: The complaint touches on public trust in county governance and on whether elected officials' actions and staffing choices properly separate public duties from personal interests. Commissioners described follow-up options but did not vote on a formal response during the meeting.
What happens next: Commissioners and county staff indicated follow-up outside the public meeting—Hoyte said he would investigate, and the county attorney said he would confer with the county manager about Facebook moderation and other procedural matters.
