Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mallard Point topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Belvedere planning commission approves Mallard Point timing changes, keeps protections for four replacement affordable units
Summary
After extensive public comment, the commission approved amendments to Mallard Point approvals that allow concurrent phase-1 construction starts while requiring the apartment building that includes the four replacement affordable units to receive certificates of occupancy prior to or at the same time as other phase-1 dwellings.
Get email alerts on the Mallard Point topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Belvedere Planning Commission voted unanimously to amend conditions of approval for the Mallard Point development, a 40-unit project that includes four on-site replacement affordable apartments.
Staff framed the changes as narrow and implementation-focused. Planning staff told the commission that agency reviews and building-permit submittals have taken longer than originally anticipated and recommended clarifying timelines and sequencing. Jay Luchetti, representing the applicant, said the amendments "don't relax any requirements" and asked the commission to align the approvals with legal tenant-notice requirements that make demolition timing infeasible under the current language: "State law requires that existing residents be provided 180 days notice prior to vacating their units," he said.
Neighbors and housing advocates pressed the commission to preserve the city's leverage to ensure the affordable units are delivered first. Susan Clough, speaking for a neighborhood group, warned that the requested edits "undermine the intent of the original conditions of approval" and said changing Condition 22 would remove the city's strongest leverage to make the affordable units a priority. Jim Hornthal said weakening Condition 22 "sets a very dangerous precedent."
Commissioners sought a compromise that allows the developer to start phase-1 buildings concurrently while ensuring the apartment building that contains the four affordable units is completed first in practice. The adopted change requires that the apartment building, "including the 4 affordable units," receive a certificate of occupancy or final inspection prior to or at the same time as any other dwelling unit in the project. The commission also accepted staff's recommendation to treat demolition timing as tied to permit issuance with a 75-day completion window, rather than counting time from an undefined "commencement" moment.
The commission added conditions to improve transparency during construction, including the expectation of a construction-monitoring report so the city can track schedule and financing risks. Commissioners said the edits balance the city's interest in securing affordable housing with the practical financing constraints developers described. The motion passed without recorded dissension.

